As well as being an active photographer endowed with all the day-to-day logistical nightmares of safely storing and archiving my own work, I have acquired over the years, some large photo collections from other sources. There is no possible way, mathematically, I will ever have enough time to scan and digitally archive it. I don't have enough time to manage my own output.
However, come the day I am no longer around to point people who might want to see any of this stuff in the right direction, they will (hopefully) not find access to the material too difficult. It's labelled and stored in a sort of orderly fashion. At least, this is the scenario for 90% of the analogue material, the negatives, prints and transparencies.
The same is not true of the digital analogue archives or of the more recently acquired digitally captured material. This is stored on a variety of recordable media, including metal oxide and optical.
Assuming all the hardware necessary to access these files is frequently upgraded and the files themselves are frequently transferred to new recording media, anyone so inclined will be able to access the images.
A lot of time, far too much in fact, is already devoted to duplicating master CDs, Zip and MO discs and backing up hard drives, but I see nothing looming on the horizon of this year's photokina in the way of hardware or media which is going to make this task less demanding or less frustrating. What happened to Hitachi's 3d recording technology? What happened to Maxell's impending launch a year ago of their new holographic based technology? What happened to the self propogating crystal flourite technology I wrote about almost four years ago that would save archivists from an early death? more .....
Read the full posting at www.ajaxnetphoto.blogspot.com.
AjaxNetPhoto